USPTO serial 85149168
CABALLITO CERRERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CABALLITO CERRERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gonzalez, Jose Alfonso Serrano
Atotonilco, Jalisco, MX
Gonzalez, Jose Alfonso Serrano
Atotonilco, Jalisco, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Refugio Jose Gonzalez
15213 CORDARY AVELAWNDALE, CA 90260-2315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Tequila | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |