USPTO serial 85149936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen S. Simpson
ELLEN S SIMPSON SIMPSON & SIMPSON PLLC5555 MAIN STWILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221-5430UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines featuring lifestyle and culture content related to martial arts and general sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Sports bags; backpacks; athletic bags; messenger bags; knapsacks; carry-all bags; satchels; sling bags; travel bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Sports bottles sold empty; plastic water bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Martial arts uniforms, namely, gis | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Operating of sports gyms; operating of martial arts gyms; organizing sporting events, namely, competition and entertainment demonstrations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |