USPTO serial 85150233
NATURAL ELEMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURAL ELEMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. Roxanne Edwards
S. ROXANNE EDWARDS BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP2001 ROSS AVE STE 2300DALLAS, TX 75201-2968UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Wooden cooking spoons; mortar and pestles; wooden flatware, namely, forks, spoons and knives; cutlery, namely, forks, spoons and knives; forks; spoons; knives; non-electric hand-operated food choppers; non-electric can openers; pizza cutters; egg slicers; non-electric shrimp deveiners and peelers; lobster and crab crackers; fish bone tweezers for household use; oyster shuckers; mandolins for cutting food; cherry and olive pitters; non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers; zesters; non-electric knife sharpeners; household kitchen utility shears | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Wooden household utensils, namely, spatulas, turners, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, kitchen tongs, serving spoons, mixing spoons, slotted spoons, basting spoons, pepper mills, salt mills, salt and pepper shakers, salad servers, and knives; woks (non-electric); chopping boards; wooden chopping boards; salt and pepper shakers; oil and vinegar cruets; salad bowls; wooden salad bowls; holders for household and kitchen utensils; glass storage jars; cookware, namely, pots and pans; roasting pans and frying pans; baking dishes; casserole dishes; roasting dishes; serving dishes; bakeware; cooking pot sets; dispensers for paper towels; rolling pins; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; cooking forks; serving forks; pasta serving forks; cooking utensils, namely, batter dispensers, grills, wire baskets, graters, cheese graters, sieves, spatulas, strainers, turners, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, whisks, skimmers, kitchen tongs, splatter screens, and non-metal flexible lids designed for draining or pressing liquids from a food can; brushes for basting meat; cooking funnels; cooking skewers; cooking roasting forks; garlic presses; egg separators; spoon rests; trivets; kitchen ladles; coffee scoops; tea strainers; non-electric egg beaters; lemon squeezers; oil cruets; salad spinners; flour sifters; food basters; melon ballers; barbeque, serving and cooking forks; mixing, basting and serving spoons; creamer pitchers; bottle openers; bread boards; corkscrews; hand-operated grinders; tart scoops; serving spoons; oven to table racks; pot lids; pot stands; butter pans; glass pans; dinnerware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |