Drawing for ULTRAFLO

USPTO serial 85151888

ULTRAFLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRAFLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory T. Ourada

Gregory T. Ourada HILL KERTSCHER & WHARTON, LLP3350 Riverwood ParkwaySuite 800Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016(Based on Intent to Use) Paper; Writing paper(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Paper; Writing paperACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 18, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance