Drawing for QUATRO

USPTO serial 85153090

QUATRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUATRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam D. Trudell

MIRIAM D. TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cell phones; Cellular phones; Mobile phonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance