USPTO serial 85153696
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burt Magen
BURT MAGEN VIERRA MAGEN MARCUS DENIRO LLP575 MARKET STREET SUITE 2500SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94127UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for processing electronic payments; authentication software for a cellular telephone that is downloaded from a global computer network and/or recorded on computer media that can authenticate a user of the cellular telephone; computer software for transferring funds to and from others; computer software for approving payments using a cellular telephone; computer software for approving payments; Radio frequency Identification (RFID) tags; RFID readers; Radio frequency identification (RFID) credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials; hardware peripheral for mobile computing device that provides a wireless identification; hardware peripheral for mobile telephone that provides a wireless identification; point-of-sale wireless identification reader; point-of-sale terminals, point-of-sale receivers | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Processing electronic payments via a electronic communications networks; clearing and reconciling financial transactions via electronic communications networks; providing banking services via electronic communications networks; processing and transmission of payments, namely, payment transaction processing services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |