USPTO serial 85155359
DATAPIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4123923Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2012
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATAPIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn S. Bacal
GLENN S. BACAL BACAL LAW GROUP, P.C.6991 E CAMELBACK RD STE D102SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-2465UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Electronic data storage services, namely, storing electronic data at data centers; Computer services in the nature of providing an integrated suite of data and computer related services, namely, electronic data storage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer services in the nature of providing an integrated suite of data and computer related services, namely, providing computer security consulting in the area of data storage, online security and information security vulnerability; Providing a secure and safe environment for the information technology systems of others, namely, providing computer co-location services in the nature of providing facilities for the location of computer servers and equipment of others; Computer services in the nature of monitoring and managing computer network systems; Network security services in the nature of computer network security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Security management services, namely, computer consultation in the field of computer security; Disaster recovery services, namely, computer disaster recovery planning and recovery of computer data; Server management services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Data backup services, namely, back-up services for computer hard drive data; Web site hosting services; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology cloud computing systems of others; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing and application systems; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing, namely, consulting in connection with cloud computing applications and networks; Technical consulting services in the fields of public and private cloud computing, namely, consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Technical support services, namely, monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; Providing on-demand resource allocation for computer systems including access to virtual servers and virtual machines; Hosting the software and other computer applications of others on a virtual private and public server; Technical support services for hardware, software and operating systems in the nature of monitoring, diagnosing and problem resolution related to software applications; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of electronic messaging systems of others including troubleshooting, optimizing, patching, hardening, storage management, mailbox movement, installation and configuration and migration of electronic messages and message systems, such as e-mail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |