CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EASY CLEAN

USPTO serial 85155584

EASY CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASY CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

RAJ ABHYANKER LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003General purpose cleaning and polishing liquids and powders for use on hard surfaces; and Polymer sealant for cleaning, shining and protecting hard automobile, trucks, motorcycles, boats and aircrafts exterior and interior surfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 27, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance