USPTO serial 85156358
G CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clark A. Puntigam
CLARK A. PUNTIGAM JENSEN & PUNTIGAM, P.S.2033 6TH AVE STE 1020SEATTLE, WA 98121-2527UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Teaching and training in strategic planning relating to business operations, innovation and profitability | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2012 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 16, 2012 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |