Drawing for CLINICAL GRADE

USPTO serial 85156652

CLINICAL GRADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLINICAL GRADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. W. Reick

H W REICK PRICE HENEVELD LLP695 KENMOOR SEPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Night teeth guardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 22, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 22, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 5, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 20, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 13, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 13, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 21, 2011RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Nov 21, 2011RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2011RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 13, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance