Drawing for MCLENDON · COMPLETE · · HARDWARE ·

USPTO serial 85156779

MCLENDON · COMPLETE · · HARDWARE ·

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MCLENDON · COMPLETE · · HARDWARE ·?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Lowe

David A. Lowe Lowe Graham Jones701 Fifth AvenueSuite 4800Seattle, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Rental of construction and building equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 21, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 21, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance