USPTO serial 85157057
ESNAKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2011
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ESNAKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry C. Harris, Jr.
Jerry C. Harris, Jr. Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP3131 McKinney AvenueSuite 100Dallas, TX 75204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | online retail store services for food products; advertising, marketing and promotion services for food products of others; computerized trading of food products for others provided over the internet; computerized online search and ordering service featuring the retail distribution of food products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 19, 2011 |
| 039 | distribution services, namely, delivery of food products by truck and air | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 19, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Mexican Marketing, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Mexican Marketing, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named ESNAKS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |