USPTO serial 85158535
CETAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3984852Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 28, 2011
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CETAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Omaha, NE
Omaha, NE
Omaha, NE
THOUSAND OAKS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Z. Zoetewey
David J. Zoetewey Teledyne Technologies Incorporated1049 Camino Dos RiosThousand Oaks, CA 91360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laboratory equipment for chemical analysis, namely, ultrasonic nebulizers for increasing liquid sample aerosol production and enabling higher analyte signal, pneumatic nebulizers to convert a liquid sample into an aerosol, desolvating nebulizers for reducing solvent-based interferences and improving analyte signal, microconcentric nebulizers for converting a small liquid sample into an aerosol, hydride generators for generation of volatile hydride species or the reduction of mercury to volatile mercuric oxide, mercury analyzers for detecting and measuring ultra-trace mercury in samples, laser solid ablators for ablating a solid sample to create a particulate aerosol for transport to an analyzer, automated samplers for eliminating manual sample introduction, micro-automated samplers for eliminating manual sample introduction of small volume samples, pre-concentrating samplers for preconcentrating analytes and auto-diluting samplers for eliminating manual sample preparation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SD Acquisition, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SD Acquisition, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SD Acquisition, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TELEDYNE INSTRUMENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CETAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |