Drawing for R BRAND

USPTO serial 85160811

R BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini, Esq.

Jill M. Pietrini, Esq. Sheppard Mullin Richters & Hampton LLP1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600Los Angeles, CA 90067-6017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, jeans, pants, tops, jackets, shorts, shirts, bottoms and dressesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Dec 11, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 7, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jul 31, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 11, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 10, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 5, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 4, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 5, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 29, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Oct 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 28, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance