USPTO serial 85161394
RUGGEDNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUGGEDNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OAKVILLE, ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Filip A. Kowalewski
Filip A. Kowalewski Siemens Industry, Inc.3333 Old Milton ParkwayAlpharetta, GA 30005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer chassis; open frame computer chassis for enclosed electrical modules; enclosed electrical computer modules; power modules for powering enclosed electrical computer modules; line modules for containing electrical components to be connected to a computer chassis; switch modules for switching data between electrical components; control modules for controlling the function of other computer modules and electrical components; casings specifically adapted for the aforementioned modules; computer software for monitoring computer network systems; computer software for visualizing a computer network; computer software for discovering devices connected to a computer network; computer network communication routers and switches, gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware, computers, and modems; fiber optic cables, cable connectors and filters; fiber optical networks comprised of computer hubs, computer switches and fiber-to-electrical media converters, communication hubs, network communication routers and computer switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; computer network hubs, switches and routers having fiber optical ports; computer hubs, routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of computer hubs, computer switches, fiber-to-electrical media converters, serial to Ethernet servers, communication hubs, network communication routers, computer hubs, computer network routers, switches and serial to Ethernet servers having mixed fiber optic to electrical media ports, and components therefor; computer network hubs, switches and routers having optical ports and components therefor; computer hubs, routers, switches, serial to Ethernet servers and serial device servers having mixed fiber optic and copper ports; video encoders; fiber optic to cable converters; fiber optical to electrical media converters; serial to Ethernet gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; serial device computer servers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; online retail store featuring communication routers, switches, gateways, computers, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks; retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; conducting online exhibitions of fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment for retail purpose on communication media; providing on-line business information services in the field of the commercial uses of fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment; sales promotion featuring fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | monitoring of network systems; technical support services, namely, computer diagnostic services for network system; computer network design for others; computer network consulting services; management of computer networks, namely, remote computer network technical monitoring and software maintenance services; computer consultation in the field of communications networks; monitoring of computer network systems for system failure or decrease in performance; technical support services, namely, monitoring the performance of and physical structural integrity of computer network systems; monitoring of computer network systems for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |