Drawing for SENTIO CODEC

USPTO serial 85161608

SENTIO CODEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENTIO CODEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

Beth M. Goldman ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST STE 1100IP Prosecution DepartmentIRVINE, CA 92614-8280

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Distributed computing featuring non-downloadable software for use in providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, web sites, and databases for wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of data and content to handheld computers, laptops, personal computers, mobile phones, TV's, projectors, stand-alone hardware decoders and mobile electronic devices; distributed computing featuring non-downloadable software allowing users to upload, post and display online digital content for sharing with others for entertainment purposes; computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow users to collaborate in the preparation, uploading, downloading, sharing, publishing, reception and transmission of digital content to remote devices; computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow users to collaborate in the preparation, uploading, downloading, sharing, publishing, reception and transmission of digital content to remote devices for the purpose of communicating and sharing experiences and for entertainment purposesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 7, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 18, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 22, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 3, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 3, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance