Drawing for SKYBUILD

USPTO serial 85163384

SKYBUILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYBUILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha Stolt, Esq.

MARSHA STOLT, ESQ. MOSS & BARNETT, P.A.90 S 7TH ST STE 4800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Providing downloadable software that allows users to diagnose, repair, rebuild and restore their personal computer via the InternetACTIVE
039Providing remote storage of computer program license information and computer dataACTIVE
042Technical support services, namely, on-line troubleshooting of computer software problems; technical support services, namely, on-line troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; on-line repair of computer software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software to allow users to diagnose, repair, rebuild and restore a personal computer; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software to allow users to remove data from a computer hard drive without rendering the computer inoperativeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 30, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 6, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 16, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 15, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 15, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 4, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance