USPTO serial 85163498
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Menlo Park, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. Coleman
Brian R. Coleman PERKINS COIE LLP3150 Porter DrivePalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for sharing, reviewing, posting images of culinary creations of others including, restaurants, food trucks, cafes, bakeries; Computer software for trending and tracking popularity of culinary creations, in particular, location-based trending and popularity tracking of food and beverage items; Computer software for personalized searching and filtering of food-related items; Computer software for search, filtering, and sorting of food-related items including dishes of restaurants that is location-based, ingredient-based, or dietary specification-based; Computer software for personalized recommendation of culinary creations such as dishes or beverages of restaurants or other establishments based on user ratings or preferences related to food or beverage items; Computer software and platform for restaurants or other establishments in the food/beverage industry to promote, market, publicize, share, or update menus and/or other offerings to others | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online advertising services for restaurants to promote deals and discounts to targeted consumers and to publicize or market menus or other current offerings to consumers; Providing targeted advertising services to restaurants or other types of establishments in the food/beverage industry; Providing advertising service to distribute advertisements of others, such as ads or promotions of restaurant/beverage industry for display on Internet, namely, in websites, social conversations over the Internet, blogs, electronic messages, instant messages, multimedia messages, social networks, post and reviews of restaurants or culinary creations;Downloadable information surrounding food, restaurants, and associated reviews via wireless devices; Marketing, advertising, and promotion of culinary creations, restaurants, and other food/beverage related offerings made available wireless electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Online services or application services provider of web-based services for enabling sharing, reviewing, posting images of culinary creations of others; Online services delivered over the Internet for providing and sharing of menu, food items, of restaurants and other establishments by consumers with others; Online services for the promotion of offerings of restaurants or other establishments to consumers in a targeted fashion based on knowledge of culinary preferences; Providing online search and web-based personalized recommendation for food, beverages, or other culinary creations; providing search features for food and beverage items for users based on preferences or ratings; Creating and maintaining blogs of others surrounding food, beverages, or other culinary creations of restaurants or other establishments; Developing and managing application software and databases for delivery of multi-media content surrounding food, restaurants, recipes, dishes provided by consumers or food/beverage retailers on wireless mobile devices; Providing user-generated content in the nature of blogs featuring food/beverage items of others including consumers and/or food/beverage retailers automatically selected and customized, filtered, or sorted based on geographical location of an Internet, mobile telephone or other wired or wireless digital network based customer; Mobile application services provider, namely, hosting computer and software applications for others in the field food and restaurants; Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites, in the fields of wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of content related to food, recipes, user reviews related to food/beverage items and/or establishments in the food/beverage industry via hand held devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services in the field of restaurant and food reviews provided through a web-based interface or mobile-interface surrounding food, beverages, or other culinary creations; Online social network services for users to share, review, and comment on review of culinary creations made by others; Online social networking services for sharing culinary experiences with others and viewing culinary experiences of others through posts, reviews, pictures videos, or other multimedia content | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |