Drawing for OPEN ARCHITECTURE NETWORK

USPTO serial 85163609

OPEN ARCHITECTURE NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPEN ARCHITECTURE NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Rozenblat

ALEXANDER ROZENBLAT JENNER & BLOCK LLP353 N CLARK ST STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60654-5474UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable fundraisingACTIVEMar 9, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 11, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 11, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 4, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 4, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 4, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 26, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 26, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance