USPTO serial 85163890
KADCYLA TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KADCYLA TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations containing trastuzumab emtansine for treatment of cardiovascular diseases and disorders, oncological diseases and disorders, immune diseases and disorders, angiogenesis diseases and disorders, ocular diseases and disorders, inflammatory diseases and disorders, gastro-intestinal diseases and disorders, respiratory diseases and disorders, neurological diseases and disorders, infectious diseases and disorders, metabolic diseases and disorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing educational training in the medical field | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENENTECH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENENTECH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named KADCYLA TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |