USPTO serial 85165569
TASTY DELITE LET'S WING IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TASTY DELITE LET'S WING IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Countryside, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Brezina
DAVID C BREZINA LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVESTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |