Drawing for SKY CHUTES COFFEEHOUSE

USPTO serial 85166286

SKY CHUTES COFFEEHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKY CHUTES COFFEEHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Rick Tache

J. RICK TACHE SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 East Van Buren StreetOne Arizona CenterPhoenix, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, caps, sweaters and jacketsACTIVE
035mobile food cart servicesACTIVE
043cafe and carryout restaurant servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Aug 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 13, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Jul 13, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jul 13, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 13, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 22, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 19, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 27, 2011UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
May 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Nov 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance