USPTO serial 85166843
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
SABRINA C. STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Courier services, namely, transportation of packages, parcels and envelopes by various modes of transportation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |