USPTO serial 85167256
M MADE BY MUNKSJO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M MADE BY MUNKSJO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
551 12 Jonkoping, SE
551 12 Jonkoping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin A. Thompson
Kevin A. Thompson Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan, Suite 1600Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Paper pulp; wood pulp for manufacturing purposes; cellulose pulp for manufacturing purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | Cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; abrasive paper | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Paper and cardboard; goods made from paper and cardboard not included in other classes, namely, fine arts paper, thin print papers, exclusive papers and cardboard for packaging; printed matter, namely, brochures, product sheets, catalogues, periodicals in the field of paper products and building materials; plastic materials for packaging, namely, plastic bags, plastic foil/film for foodstuffs, plastic foil/film for mailing; thin paper; interleaving paper; heat transfer paper; protective paper for goods; carbonized paper; laminated paper; plastic laminated paper; paper materials for packaging; bags envelopes, and pouches of paper or plastics, for packaging; plastic for wrapping or packaging; plastic film for wrapping and packaging; decor papers used for surface upgrading of wood based panels by being printed and/or impregnated and/or laminated; impregnated paper used for surface upgrading by being printed and/or laminated for use in manufacturing of goods such as plane furniture, decoration panels and floors | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing, stopping and insulating materials; insulating paper for cables; insulating paper for transformers; laminated paper for electrical laminates, namely, insulation board components; plastic film, not for packaging, for the building industry; cellulose foil, other than for packaging, for the building industry; paper foil, other than for packaging, for the building industry; impregnated foil for use in manufacturing of goods such as plane furniture, decoration panels and floors; plastic clingfilm for use in palletization | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | Resin impregnated papers for building construction | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MUNKSJO SWEDEN AB
- Other trademarks owned by MUNKSJO SWEDEN AB
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named M MADE BY MUNKSJO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |