Drawing for BUILDING ECONOMIES TO SAVE ECOLOGIES

USPTO serial 85168615

BUILDING ECONOMIES TO SAVE ECOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILDING ECONOMIES TO SAVE ECOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle Katz

MICHELLE KATZ MICHELLE KATZ, ATTORNEY4570 VAN NUYS BLVD # 568SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403-2913UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting of educational meetings, summits, conferences, seminars and educational performances in the nature of live readings and educational exhibitions all dealing with wildlife preservation issues and the impact of consumer and industrial products on wildlife preservation issue; providing news reporting services, namely, providing current event news content through photographic, film and video reports; providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of books, newspapers, newsletters, magazines in the field of wildlife preservation issues and the impact of consumer and industrial products on wildlife preservation; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction for individuals and companies in the field of wildlife awareness and protection and distribution of course materials in connection therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 18, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 17, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 17, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 17, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance