USPTO serial 85168910
LOOPERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2011
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOOPERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chestnut Ridge, NY
Chestnut Ridge, NY
Chestnut Ridge, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simon Bock
1430 BROADWAY RM 1615NEW YORK, NY 10018-3356UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Shoe lace tying training aid systems comprised of shoe laces and of mini laced shoes with hook and loop pads attached to the laces; shoe laces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |