Drawing for TRASH PLANET

USPTO serial 85171150

TRASH PLANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRASH PLANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Dentons US LLPWACKER DR. STATION, 233 SOUTH WACKER DR.P.O. BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Pillows, namely, bed pillows, accent pillows, novelty pillows, floor pillows, bean bag pillows, and bath pillows; sleeping bagsACTIVE
024Bedding, namely, sheets, blankets, duvets, pillow cases, fitted bed sheet covers, comforters, bed blankets and silk blanketsACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, pajamas, pants, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, underwear, hats, skirts, sweaters, gloves, scarves, outer jackets, swimsuits and socksACTIVE
028Toys, namely, dolls, plush toys, modeled plastic toy figurines, attachable, wearable, magnetic toy figurines and action figuresACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 15, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 6, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 11, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 10, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jun 6, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 29, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 9, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 9, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance