Drawing for SEA LAND NUTRITION

USPTO serial 85172364

SEA LAND NUTRITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEA LAND NUTRITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Kleinberg

ELIZABETH A. KLEINBERG DINSE, KNAPP & MCANDREW, P.C.209 BATTERY STBURLINGTON, VT 05401-5261UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services and catalogue ordering services featuring salts, herbs, herb blends, nutritional bars, beverages, sweeteners, oils, seeds, nuts, nut butters, dried fruits, prepackaged food products, food grains, condiments, body care products, kitchen tools, exercise equipment, home furnishings, books, CDs, DVDs, nutritional supplements, gift packages, and educational materialsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 4, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 4, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 4, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance