Drawing for TEAM USPA

USPTO serial 85172493

TEAM USPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEAM USPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Barsky

Daniel J. Barsky Shutts & Bowen LLP200 S. Biscayne BoulevardSuite 4100Miami, FL 33131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, jackets, blazers, headwear, and shirtsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 16, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 16, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 16, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 16, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 8, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 18, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 6, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 6, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 12, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 24, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Nov 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance