Drawing for THE PARENT EXPERIMENT

USPTO serial 85175056

THE PARENT EXPERIMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PARENT EXPERIMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francie R. Gorowitz

FRANCIE R. GOROWITZ ROSENFELD, MEYER & SUSMAN, LLP9601 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 710BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-5225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable podcasts, sound recordings arranged in an album, and sound recordings in the nature of singles featuring reality based shows comprised of interviews, social commentary and discussions about raising children, downloadable ring tones, graphics and music via a global computer network and wireless devices, pre-recorded DVDs, CDs, and high definition DVDs featuring reality based shows comprised of interviews, social commentary and discussions about raising childrenACTIVE
041Entertainment services, namely, provision of continuing entertainment shows in the nature of reality-based shows comprised of interviews, social commentary and discussions about raising children delivered by the Internet, and other electronic means, namely, by the Internet to mobile devices; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts featuring interviews, social commentary and discussions about raising childrenACTIVEJan 29, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 26, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 9, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 9, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 15, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance