Drawing for THE ECO-MAT AN INNOVATION IN ENGINEERED TRANSIT PROTECTION

USPTO serial 85175397

THE ECO-MAT AN INNOVATION IN ENGINEERED TRANSIT PROTECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE ECO-MAT AN INNOVATION IN ENGINEERED TRANSIT PROTECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Merchandise packaging for othersACTIVEJan 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2011GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Feb 22, 2011GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jan 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Nov 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance