USPTO serial 85175767
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Reena J. Patel
REENA J. PATEL LAW OFFICE OF REENA J. PATELPO BOX 91023SAN DIEGO, CA 92169-3023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bangle bracelets; bangles; body jewelry placed on skin using non-toxic adhesive, Bracelets; Broaches; Bronze Jewelry; charms for collar jewelry and breacelet; costume jewelry; diamond jewelry; Gemstone jewelry; Gold thread jewelry; Identification bracelets; inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Jewel Chains; jewel pendants; jewelry; jewelry and imitation jewelry; jewelry chains; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; jewelry stickpins; jewelrey, namely, anklets; jewelry, namely, precious metal plated real leaves and flowers; jewelry, namely, stone pendants; jewels; pints being jewelry; plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; precious and semi-precious crystal stones and beads for use in jewelry; rings; rings being jewelry; stanless steel jewelry bracelets; watches and jewelry; watches, clocks, jewelry and imittion jewelry; women's jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |