USPTO serial 85179072
EDPFM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2015
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EDPFM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paris, FR
Paris, FR
LUXEMBOURG, LU
LUXEMBOURG, LU
L-1247 LUXEMBOURG, LU
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Heiss
Jessica Heiss The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.110 E. 59th St., 11th FloorTrademark DepartmentNew York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Advertising, business organization consultancy, bill presentment services, and dissemination of advertising services all the foregoing for mail order and retail department stores; franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in establishment and operation of cosmetic department stores; ] sales promotion for others provided through the distribution and administration of privileged user cards; [ information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management; ] retail store and mail order services all featuring perfumery, perfumes, essential oils [, cosmetics, deodorants for personal use, oils for perfumes and makeup removers ] all via telecommunication; retail store and mail order services all featuring body wash [ and hair cleaning preparations ] all via telecommunications; retail store and mail order services all featuring incense and room fragrances all via telecommunications; retail store and mail order services all featuring [ tanning and after-tanning milks, ] gels and oils [, make-up preparations, hair shampoos, hair gels, hair mousses and non-medicated hair balms ] all via telecommunications; [ retail store and mail order services all featuring cosmetic preparations in aerosol form for hairdressing and haircare, hair lotions and talcum powder all via telecommunications; ]retail store and mail order services all featuring candles and wicks for lighting scented candles and fuel oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty consultation in the selection and use of perfumery and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Editions de Parfums
- Other trademarks owned by Editions de Parfums
- Other trademarks owned by NOUVELLES EDITIONS DE PARFUMS
- Other trademarks owned by NOUVELLES EDITIONS DE PARFUMS
- Other trademarks owned by NEDP HOLDING S.A R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by EDITIONS DE PARFUMS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named EDPFM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 27, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |