USPTO serial 85179172
CLEAN.4.E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4508776Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2014
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEAN.4.E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
VICTORIA, BC, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Johnson
Mark C. Johnson JOHNSON DALAL111 N. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 105PLANTATION, FL 33324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Skin cleansers; hand cleaning gels; liquid soaps; skin soap ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Hand and skin sanitizer solution | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Dispensers for cleaning and disinfecting solutions; dispensers for liquid soap; manually actuated pump dispensers for attachment to containers for use in dispensing liquids; towel dispenser for cloth towels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | [ Towels ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | [ Clothing, namely, t-shirts, bathing suits and intimates, namely, underwear ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEAN4E LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by JOEY ADLER HOLDINGS ULC.
- Other trademarks owned by 7225059 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 7225059 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 7225059 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CLEAN.4.E
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 8, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |