USPTO serial 85179226
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Yates Dowell, III
A. Yates Dowell, III DOWELL & DOWELL, P.C.103 ORONOCO ST STE 220ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2046UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | BIOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS FOR USE IN THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM, NAMELY, ASSAYS, TESTS, AND DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS TO DETECT SCOLIOSIS AND THE DISEASE PROGRESSION OF IDIOPATHIC SPINAL DEFORMITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | THORACIC AND LUMBAR PROSTHESES, THORACIC AND LUMBAR ORTHESES, AND THORACIC AND LUMBAR IMPLANTS OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS FOR USE IN THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SPINAL DEFORMITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN RELATION TO ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH, BIOMECHANICAL RESEARCH AND THE RADIOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF IDIOPATHIC SOLUTIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SPINAL DEFORMITIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |