Drawing for ORTHOBIOM

USPTO serial 85179226

ORTHOBIOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ORTHOBIOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Yates Dowell, III

A. Yates Dowell, III DOWELL & DOWELL, P.C.103 ORONOCO ST STE 220ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005BIOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS FOR USE IN THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM, NAMELY, ASSAYS, TESTS, AND DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS TO DETECT SCOLIOSIS AND THE DISEASE PROGRESSION OF IDIOPATHIC SPINAL DEFORMITIESACTIVE—
010THORACIC AND LUMBAR PROSTHESES, THORACIC AND LUMBAR ORTHESES, AND THORACIC AND LUMBAR IMPLANTS OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS FOR USE IN THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SPINAL DEFORMITIESACTIVE—
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN RELATION TO ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH, BIOMECHANICAL RESEARCH AND THE RADIOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF IDIOPATHIC SOLUTIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SPINAL DEFORMITIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 30, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 15, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 13, 2013CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 12, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 6, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 31, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 26, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2012CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 26, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 24, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance