USPTO serial 85179263
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Mark Blank
19 LEDGEWOOD COMMONSMILLWOOD, NY 10546-1026UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; fragrances; perfumes; skin care, namely, moisturizer, facial wash, and cleanser; nail polish; personal care products, namely, shampoo, body wash, conditioner, soap, shower gel | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | watches; cufflinks; key fobs of precious metals; jewelry; jewelry boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | pouches, namely leather pouches, pouches for holding makeup, keys and other personal items; purses; handbags; pocketbooks; clutches; backpacks; book bags; sports bags; bum bags; wallets; duffle bags; garment bags for travel; tote bags; shoulder bags; luggage; sack packs, namely, drawstring bags used as backpacks; evening handbags; evening bags; fashion handbags; gentleman's handbags; handbags for ladies; handbags for men; leather handbags; coin purses; key fobs; makeup cases sold empty; lipstick cases sold empty; hand mirror cases of leather; leather key chains; accessories, namely briefcases, attaché cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | bedding, namely, bed sheets, pillow cases, blankets, down blankets, quilts, bed skirts, throw blankets, fitted sheets, pillow shams, bedspreads, bed covers, comforters, curtains, shower curtains; bed sheets; bath towels; towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | apparel, namely, shirts, pants, dresses, skirts, gowns, party dresses, thongs, suits, ties, knits in the nature of sweaters and scarves, sweaters, robes, underwear, pajamas, leggings, scarves, gloves, outerwear in the nature of raincoats jackets blazers and down jackets, intimates in the nature of pajamas panties hosiery robes and bras, hosiery, lingerie, underwear, socks, sleepwear, athletic uniforms, jackets, cloths in the nature of pants shirts vests and shorts, tops, coats, neckties, bowties, raincoats, winter coats, leather jackets, caps, hats, derbies, felt hats, leather caps; wristbands; headbands; masks in the nature of sleep masks; facemasks; footwear, namely, athletic footwear, beach footwear, climbing footwear, flip flops, footwear for children, footwear for men, footwear for women, footwear for teens, footwear for men and women, dress footwear, pumps, high heel shoes, shoes, men's shoes, ladies shoes, work boots, hiking boots, snow boots, boots, sandals, sneakers, running shoes, slippers; belts; bibs not of paper; cloth diapers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |