Drawing for VERAMONTE EL CABALLERO

USPTO serial 85180029

VERAMONTE EL CABALLERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERAMONTE EL CABALLERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. Scott Gerien Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 23, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 23, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 6, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 23, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 23, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 23, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance