USPTO serial 85180278
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey
Roger P. Furey Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP2900 K Street, N.W.North Tower, Suite 200Washington, DC 20007-5118| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Pre-applied protective surface coating sold as a component of laminate, wood and non-metallic tile flooring | ACTIVE | Nov 13, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |