USPTO serial 85180355
ITVS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITVS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Satorius
CHRISTOPHER P BEALL LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ LLP321 WEST 44TH STREETSUITE 510NEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Video streaming services and transmission services of audio visual works via a global computer network, Internet, cable, broadband, copper, and optical and wireless networks; broadcasting transmissions of audio visual works, messages and information via a global computer network, Internet, cable, broadband, copper, optical and wireless networks | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |