USPTO serial 85180765
NANOMISER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NANOMISER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Brown
WILLIAM M. BROWN NGIMAT CO.5315 PEACHTREE BLVDATLANTA, GA 30341-2107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | LIQUID ATOMIZATION DEVICES FOR THE DISPERSION OF CHEMICAL AGENTS, NAMELY, ATOMIZERS FOR ATOMIZING PRECURSORS FOR CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION OF THIN FILM COATINGS; ATOMIZERS FOR INJECTING FUEL IN GASOLINE SPARK IGNITION ENGINES, COMPRESSION IGNITION ENGINES, HEAVY FUEL ENGINES, BIOFUEL ENGINES, MIXED FUEL ENGINES, AIRCRAFT TURBINE ENGINES, MARINE TURBINE ENGINES, AUTOMOTIVE TURBINE ENGINES, OIL BURNING FURNACES, OIL BURNING HEATERS, INDUSTRIAL BOILERS AND MARINE BOILERS; ATOMIZERS FOR SPRAYING LIQUIDS IN THE MANUFACTURE AND SPRAY DRYING OF DAIRY PRODUCTS, COFFEE, TEA, STARCHES, PHARMACEUTICALS, SOAPS, DETERGENTS AND PIGMENTS; ATOMIZERS FOR SPRAYING LIQUIDS IN SPRAY COOLING DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF SPRAY PONDS AND EVAPORATIVE TOWERS; ATOMIZERS FOR DISPERSING LIQUIDS CONTAINING POWDERED METALS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF INDUSTRIAL COATINGS; ATOMIZERS FOR MATERIAL DISPERSION IN PARTICLE COATING DEVICES FOR PRODUCING PROTECTIVE COATINGS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC AND ELECTROPHORETIC PARTICLES; ATOMIZERS FOR THE DISPERSION OF AGRICULTURAL SPRAYS, INSECTICIDES, HERBICIDES AND FERTILIZERS; AND ATOMIZERS FOR DISPERSING MATERIAL IN ELECTROSTATIC SPRAY DEVICES IN SPECTROSCOPY, AGRICULTURAL SPRAYING AND INDUSTRIAL PAINTING | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |