USPTO serial 85180933
THE WELL APPOINTED HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE WELL APPOINTED HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew C. Wagner
MATTHEW C. WAGNER DISERIO MARTIN O'CONNOR & CASTIGLIONI, LLP1 ATLANTIC ST STE 500STAMFORD, CT 06901-2427UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Chairs; chair beds; chair cushions; chair mats in the nature of a pillow or seat liner; chair pads; chaise lounges; armchairs; armoires; entertainment centers; television stands; toy chests; console tables; dressers; hutches; buffets; cabinets for display purposes; wine racks; stools; cupboards; cupboards for tea-things cabinets; beds; bunk beds; night tables; nightstands; desks; writing desks; benches; dining chairs; dining room tables; dining tables; bookcases; bookshelves; display racks; display stands; display tables; end tables; screens; sofas; sofa beds; love seats; lounge chairs; settees; ottoman seats; ottomans; bed frames; bed headboards; bed pillows; bed rails; bedroom furniture; beds; beds, mattresses, pillows and bolsters; bedside tables; shower curtain hooks; towel racks; fireplace screens; decorative boxes made of wood; magazine racks; umbrella stands; picture frames; picture frames of precious metal; picture frames with plush outer decorative surfaces; mirrors; patio furniture; rocking chairs; cribs; bassinets; cradles; high chairs; high chairs for babies; toy boxes; toy boxes and chests; toy chests; baby bouncers; diaper changing mats; and dog beds | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2003 |
| 021 | TRAYS FOR DOMESTIC PURPOSES; ICE BUCKETS; LAUNDRY HAMPERS FOR DOMESTIC HOUSEHOLD USE; WASTE BASKETS; PLATES; PLATES FOR HORS D'OEUVRE; DECORATIVE PLATES; GLASS BEVERAGEWARE; CANDLE HOLDERS; CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CANDLE HOLDERS OF PRECIOUS METAL; CANDLESTICKS; CANDLE STICKS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CANDLESTICKS OF GLASS; CANDLESTICKS OF PRECIOUS METAL; PLANTERS FOR FLOWERS AND PLANTS; BIRD FEEDERS; BIRD HOUSES; URNS; PICNIC BASKETS SOLD EMPTY; PET FEEDING AND DRINKING BOWLS; PET FEEDING DISHES; and FLASKS | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2003 |
| 024 | DINING LINENS; BED SPREADS; BED AND TABLE LINEN; WALL HANGINGS OF TEXTILE; BED BLANKETS; BED CANOPIES; BED COVERS; BED LINEN; BED SHEETS; BED SKIRTS; BED THROWS; TERRY TOWELS; SHOWER CURTAIN LINERS; SHOWER CURTAINS; BATH TOWELS; HAND TOWELS; CHILDREN'S BLANKETS; BABY BEDDING, NAMELY, BUNDEL BAGS, SWADDLING BLANKETS, CRIB BUMPERS, FITTED CRIB SHEETS, CRIB SKIRTS, CRIB BLANKETS, AND DIAPER CHANGING PAD COVERS NOT OF PAPER; and CASHMERE BLANKETS | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Well Appointed House, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Well Appointed House, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named THE WELL APPOINTED HOME
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |