USPTO serial 85181006
ORAL SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORAL SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shaker Heights, OH
Shaker Heights, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
BRIAN E. TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated care products for relief of dry mouth and associated symptoms and conditions, namely, toothpaste, dentifrices in the form of chewing gum, breath mints, dentifrices, breath freshening candy, breath freshening strips, breath mints for use as a breath freshener, non-medicated mouth rinse, and mouth wash; toothpaste; dentifrices in the form of chewing gum; breath mints for use as a breath freshener; dentifrices; breath freshening candy; breath freshening strips; breath mints for use as a breath freshener; oral spray for personal use; breath fresheners; non-medicated mouth rinse; mouth wash; dental bleaching gel; bleaching preparations for teeth; tooth polishing preparations; tooth whitening preparations; teeth whitening preparations, namely, stain removal preparations of teeth; anti-cavity dental rinses | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated care products for relief of dry mouth and associated symptoms and conditions, namely, medicated toothpaste, medicated dentifrices in the form of chewing gum, medicated breath mints, dentifrices, medicinal preparations for the mouth and as sprays, medicated lozenges, medicated candy, spray sanitizer for personal use, antiseptic preparations, medicated oral care gels, medicated moisturizers, medicated mouth rinse, medicated mouth wash, and antiseptic preparations; medicated toothpaste; medicated chewing gum; medicated breath mints; medicated dentifrices; medicinal preparations for the mouth and as sprays; medicated candy; medicated breath mints; spray sanitizer for personal use; antiseptic preparations; medicated breath fresheners; medicated oral care gels; medicated moisturizers; medicated lozenges; medicated mouth rinse; medicated mouth wash; medicated cold sore treatment preparations; anti-cavity dental coating preparations; dental tablets for disclosing plaque and tartar on the teeth; anti-cavity dental rinses; temporary teeth fillings; denture adhesives; disinfectants for dentures | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCHC LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OCHC LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ORAL SHIELD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |