USPTO serial 85181815
DESIGNED FOR WOMEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESIGNED FOR WOMEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
CATHERINE M CLAYTON GIBBONS PCONE PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA37TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements; dietary supplements, namely, powder drink mixes, vitamins and minerals, capsules, tablets and caplets for promoting weight loss and for promoting weight management; nutritional supplements; nutritional supplements, namely, energy drinks used as a meal replacement, vitamins and minerals, capsules,tablets and caplets for supplementing nutritional dietary supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |