USPTO serial 85182138
NEEDIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEEDIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer D. Silverman
JENNIFER D. SILVERMAN ELLENOFF GROSSMAN & SCHOLE LLP150 E 42ND ST FL 11NEW YORK, NY 10017-5659UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing services in the field of the strategic use of conversations and comments on social media to provide sales leads to businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software used to provide sales leads for businesses by monitoring social media conversations and comments, detecting key words and merchant names in conversations and comments, sending messages to the social media users with offers from businesses, aggregating and organizing retrieved information from conversations in a an online dashboard, enabling merchants to view the online dashboard, and enabling the merchants to communicate online with the social media users to promote their businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2011 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |