Drawing for SUBMERSIBLE

USPTO serial 85182503

SUBMERSIBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUBMERSIBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Stern

STEVEN STERN GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE FL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting devices for event design, namely, waterproof LED decorative accent lightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 23, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 16, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 16, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 16, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 16, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance