USPTO serial 85182933
CALI'S COOKIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALI'S COOKIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Roppel
ANDREW ROPPEL HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice, pasta, noodles; packaged meals made predominantly from rice, pasta or noodles; cereals and cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals and cereal-based snack foods; flour and products made from cereals, namely, pastries; rice cakes, rice crackers; sugar, tea, coffee, caramels, cocoa; candy and candy bars; marshmallow; nougat; wafers; pudding; fruit ices; donuts; coffee essences, coffee extracts, mixtures of coffee and chicory, chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; non-medicated confectionery, namely, confectionery made of sugar; bubble gum, non-medicated chewing gum; lollipops; pastries and bakery goods, cakes and cakes mixes, biscuits, brownies, cookies, crunchy cookies, soft and chewy cookies, crackers, muffins, crispbread; icing for cakes, icing powder, icing sugar; ices, ice milk; ice cream; ice cream products, namely, ice cream sandwiches; frozen confections, frozen yogurt; desserts, namely bakery desserts and ice cream desserts; chilled desserts, namely, ice cream cones; dessert mousses; sorbets; dessert toppings, namely, fruit toppings, nut toppings, chocolate toppings, and marshmallow toppings; bread; pastries and confectionery, namely fondants; drinks, namely, espresso drinks and ice cream drinks; capers; snack foods consisting principally of confectionery, namely, chocolate based confectionery; sweet pies, chocolate, chocolates, chocolate products, namely, chocolate chips, hot chocolates; sauces including toppings for ice cream and desserts, namely, chocolate sauces; sweet spreads, namely, cocoa spreads, honey, treacle, maple syrup, foodstuffs in the nature of spreads, namely spreads containing chocolate and nuts, mustards, yeast, yeast extract spreads; baking-powder, salt, pepper, sauces, ketchup, tomato sauce, Worcestershire sauce, mint sauce, barbecue sauce; gravy; pizza, pizza bases, namely, pizza dough; cooking sauces; sauces and toppings for pizzas; sauces for pasta and rice; salad dressings; vinegar, vinaigrette, mayonnaise; chocolate dips; spices and seasonings, flavourings, marinades, condiments, namely, pepper sauce and horseradish, couscous | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |