Drawing for DICOMM DIVERSE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 85183218

DICOMM DIVERSE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DICOMM DIVERSE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Langworthy

ELISABETH A. LANGWORTHY SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW FL 2WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2415UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038communications services, namely, delivery of video, voice and data communications services through satellite transmission, wireline transmissions on hybrid fiber coaxial cable lines and wireline transmission on distribution power systems, fiber lines and copper lines, wireless transmission through industrial scientific and medical devices, spread spectrum bands and personal communication service spectrums; providing telecommunication connections to a global computer network; cellular communications through personal communication services; paging services; personal communications services; and cable leasing services, namely, the leasing of broad band cable connectionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance