Drawing for B BLURT BLURT IT OUT!

USPTO serial 85183231

B BLURT BLURT IT OUT!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B BLURT BLURT IT OUT!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edmund J. Ferdinand, III

Edmund J. Ferdinand, III FERDINAND IP, LLC129 Post Road EastWestport, CT 06880UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing online and telecommunication facilities for real-time interaction between and among users of mobile and handheld computers, and wired and wireless communication devices for posting and delivery of voice recordings, still images, video clips and other data related theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 13, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 9, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 9, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance