Drawing for TIME-ECHO

USPTO serial 85183269

TIME-ECHO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIME-ECHO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Carrithers

David W. Carrithers CARRITHERS LAW OFFICE, PLLC120 W. Stephen Foster Ave, Suite 101Bardstown, KY 40004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038transmitting communication via computer or any electronic communication device, including the transmission of messages and telecommunication services, namely, providing recipient's current contact information; and providing user access to software in data networks that involves converting media files and hosting applications, software and websites for receiving, storing, sharing, managing, and transmitting dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 9, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 1, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2011MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 2, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance