Drawing for WARP MECHANICS

USPTO serial 85183788

WARP MECHANICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WARP MECHANICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ashok Tankha

ASHOK TANKHA LIPTON WEINBERGER & HUSICK36 GREENLEIGH DRIVESEWELL, NJ 08080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; Computer hardware for upload, storage, retrieval, download, transmission and delivery of digital content; Computer networking hardwareACTIVENov 17, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 17, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 4, 2012RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Dec 4, 2012RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Nov 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 19, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 19, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 22, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 22, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance